Abstract

This article contributes to our existing knowledge through a crime script analysis of contract killings, based on six extensively analyzed police investigations in the Netherlands. Starting from a universal crime script, a more specific crime script for contract killings is elaborated. To provide a clear picture of the whole process, the description of the scenes focuses on requirements, facilitators, modi operandi, and preparatory actions. A comparison of liquidation investigations is made through a crime script analysis, which results in three types of requirements: vehicles, automatic weapons, and technical equipment, including PGP-telephones and beacons. In addition, spy shops turn out to play a major role in liquidations as facilitators. Due to a lack of licensing and regulations, the owners of spy shops can decide to a large extent on their own procedures. This leads to the possibility of buying and selling equipment anonymously and with large amounts of cash, which facilitates the preparation of liquidations and crime in general. Hitmen are the second type of important facilitators. The analysis reveals that all liquidation investigations contain indications of a principal to whom account has to be held. Two investigations clearly demonstrate financial rewards for contract killings.

Highlights

  • Contract killings shock society and create abundant media attention, yet sound empirical research into this phenomenon is extremely scarce

  • The analysis shows that Pretty-Good-Privacy telephones (PGPs) and beacons play an important role in contract killings

  • This article aims to contribute to our existing knowledge through a crime script analysis of contract killings, based on six extensively analyzed police investigations in the Netherlands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Contract killings shock society and create abundant media attention, yet sound empirical research into this phenomenon is extremely scarce. Most of the academic literature on contract killings focuses on motives and backgrounds of conflicts and the personal backgrounds of hitmen and victims, definitions of what exactly constitutes a ‘contract killing’ vary (e.g. Kleemans et al 1998; Black and Cravens 2001; Van de Port 2001; Mouzos and Venditto 2003; Van de Bunt and Kleemans 2007; Cameron 2014; MacIntyre et al 2014; Van Gestel and Verhoeven 2017; Van Gestel and Kouwenberg 2019). The early study by Black and Cravens (2001) uses crime script analysis to investigate the process of contract killings. The cases that have been analyzed in depth for this article show strong similarities in requirements, preparations, and the ways in which proof is destructed afterwards (see the empirical results section)

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call