Abstract
Introduction:Integrated care systems are advocated as an effective method of improving the performance of healthcare systems. These systems outline a payment and care delivery model that intends to tie provider reimbursements to predefined quality metrics. Little is known about the contractual design and the main challenges of delegating “accountability” to these new kinds of organisations and/or contracts. The research question in this article focuses on how healthcare contracts can look like and which possible problems arise in designing such contracts. In this a special interest is placed on information asymmetries.Methods:A comprehensive literature review on methods of designing contracts in Integrated Care was conducted. This article is the first in a row of three that all contribute to a specific issue in designing healthcare contracts. Starting with the organisation of contracts and information asymmetries, part 2 focusses on financial options and risks and part 3 finally concludes with the question of risk management and evaluation.Results:Healthcare contracting between providers and payers will have a major impact on the overall design of future healthcare systems. If Integrated care systems or any other similar concept of care delivery are to be contracted directly by payers to manage the continuum of care the costs of market utilisation play an essential role. Transaction costs also arise in the course of the negotiation and implementation of contracts. These costs are the reason why it is generally not possible to conclude perfect (complete) contracts. Problems with asymmetric distribution of information can relate to the situation before a contract is concluded (adverse selection) and after conclusion of a contract (moral hazard).Discussion and Conclusions:Information asymmetries are seen as a major obstacle to the efficient operation of integrated care programmes. Coordination and motivation problems cannot be solved at no-costs. The presented problems in the design of selective individual contracts represent a necessary but not a sufficient condition for further government intervention. A state or political failures have to be assumed continuously.
Highlights
Integrated care systems are advocated as an effective method of improving the performance of healthcare systems
How to design healthcare contracts and how to deal with asymmetric information? Accountable care organisations (ACOs) in the US and similar concepts in other countries are advocated as an effective method of improving the performance of healthcare systems [1]
Little is known about the contractual design and the main challenges of delegating “accountability” to these new kinds of organisations and/or contracts
Summary
Integrated care systems are advocated as an effective method of improving the performance of healthcare systems These systems outline a payment and care delivery model that intends to tie provider reimbursements to predefined quality metrics. The research question in this article focuses on how healthcare contracts can look like and which possible problems arise in designing such contracts. In this a special interest is placed on information asymmetries. The Healthcare Market: Segmentation of Property Rights If Integrated care systems, ACOs or any other similar concept of care delivery are to be contracted directly by payers to manage the continuum of care the costs. The health insurers, as custodians of the monies provided by their members, want the best possible services for the lowest possible price
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have