Contraceptive Method Choice in Developing Countries

Abstract

For all persons to enjoy a choice among contraceptive options a range of methods must be readily available. Yet measures of access show serious deficits that depress use of each method. Countries differ both in the number of methods offered and the extent to which each is made available. Information is needed on how these factors have changed over time and how they have affected contraceptive use overall and use of individual methods. Patterns of contraceptive use are derived from data from national surveys and levels of access to four methods (female sterilization the IUD the pill and the condom) are measured by estimates from cycles of a program effort study of the proportion of couples for whom each method is available as of 1982 1989 1994 and 1999. The analysis focuses on the relationship between access to contraceptives and patterns of use. In all four cycles of the program effort study the mean prevalence of the four methods rises with mean access. For example mean prevalence in 1994 and 1999 was close to 12% in countries with very low access compared with 44% in those with high access. Prevalence is highest in countries where access to all methods is uniformly high. In 1994 for example mean prevalence was 12% in countries where mean availability was high and diversity in the availability of individual methods was low compared with 9% in countries where mean availability was high and access to individual methods varied considerably. Between 1982 and 1994 the number of countries with uniformly high access rose from 9 to 23 while the number with uniformly low access declined from 23 to 9. At the lowest level of mean availability the condom and the pill contribute most availability (40% and 36% respectively) but at the highest level the contributions of the four methods equalize at 22- 27% each. The situation for prevalence is similar: the pills share at the lowest level of availability is 67% compared with 31% at the highest level where it is surpassed by female sterilization (36%). Full choice among a variety of contraceptive offerings is yet to be attained in many countries. Its absence restricts personal access to each method as well as the use of all methods in the population. To the extent that the ability to choose satisfactory contraceptive protection depends on ready access to multiple methods a clear mandate exists for greater programmatic attention to the provision of a full range of methods. (authors)