Abstract
A federal district court, on August 31, held that the contraceptive mandate, as applied to a nonreligious nonprofit organization and its employees with contrary religious views, is unconstitutional as a violation of the equal protection clause and is a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but it is not contrary to free exercise principles (March for Life v. Burwell (D.D.C.)).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
