Abstract
This article attempts to illuminate current pregnancy discrimination decisions by examining the ramifications of this case of first impression in reference to the split in the courts of appeals. Part I examines the Supreme Courts most recent guidance on pregnancy discrimination Johnson controls issued more than a decade ago. Part II identifies the split among the courts of appeals concerning the application and coverage of the PDA. A comprehensive review of appellate courts pregnancy discrimination decisions in the decade following Johnson Controls evidences a distinct preference between contracting the scope of the PDA and interpreting it as granting broad protections. Part III analyzes the Erickson decision itself and the underlying EEOC decision as well as related district court interpretations of Title VII and the PDA. (excerpt)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
