Abstract
The traditional form (i.e. benthamian) of understanding the free proof has involved separating the notion of probability of evidentiary weight idea. This article states that the determination of the weight of evidence cannot be delivered to the preferences of the judge, but that the legal system must provide normative criteria that lead the judicial inferences. Evidence law should regulate de strategies of exclusion, preference and corroboration that guide the evidentiary inferences of the judges when uncertainty in order to minimize the risks of error and to distribute them among the litigants when they are unavoidable. To illustrate this argument, this article offers some examples of the criminal litigation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
