Abstract
Three recent studies used similar stimulus sequences to investigate mechanisms for brightness perception. Anstis and Greenlee (2014) demonstrated that adaptation to a flickering black and white outline erased the visibility of a subsequent target shape defined by a luminance increment or decrement. Robinson and de Sa (2012, 2013) used a flickering disk or annulus to show a similar effect. Here, a neural network model of visual perception (Francis & Kim, 2012), that previously explained properties of scene fading, is shown to also explain most of the erasure effects reported by Anstis and Greenlee and by Robinson and de Sa. The model proposes that in normal viewing conditions a brightness filling-in process is constrained by oriented boundaries, which thereby define separate regions of a visual scene. Contour adaptation can weaken the boundaries and thereby allow brightness signals to merge together, which renders target stimuli indistinguishable from the background. New simulations with the stimuli used by Anstis and Greenlee and Robinson and de Sa produce model output very similar to the perceptual experience of human observers. Finally, the model predicts that adaptation to illusory contours will not produce contour erasure.
Highlights
Anstis and Greenlee (2014) demonstrated contour adaptation effects on the perceived brightness of a subsequent target that was defined by small luminance increments or decrements from a gray background
6 Conclusions With a few exceptions that are related to already known deficiencies, the model simulated by Francis and Kim (2012) to originally account for scene fading accounts for the observations of Anstis and Greenlee (2014) on contour adaptation erasure and many of the findings from Robinson and de Sa (2012, 2013)
These new reports validate the main properties of the model, especially the role of boundary contours in constraining a filling-in process
Summary
Anstis and Greenlee (2014) demonstrated contour adaptation effects on the perceived brightness of a subsequent target that was defined by small luminance increments or decrements from a gray background. Experiments, and results are similar to those in Anstis and Greenlee (2014), Robinson and de Sa (2013) argued that these effects were inconsistent with a filling-in model of perception because adaptation caused by induced flicker should have had equivalent effects regardless of the test stimulus’ size. The explanation is nearly the same as for Francis and Schoonveld (2005): the adaptation stimulus weakens boundary contours and thereby allows brightness/color signals to spread via a filling-in process.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
