Abstract
Left atrial catheter ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires periprocedural anticoagulation to minimize thromboembolic complications. High rates of major bleeding complications using dabigatran etexilate for periprocedural anticoagulation have been reported, raising concerns regarding its safety during left atrial catheter ablation. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a dabigatran use strategy versus warfarin, at a single high-volume AF ablation center. We performed a retrospective analysis on consecutive patients undergoing left atrial ablation at Vanderbilt Medical Center from January 2011 through August 2012 with a minimum follow-up of 3months. Patient cohorts were divided into two groups, those utilizing dabigatran etexilate pre- and post-ablation and those undergoing ablation on dose-adjusted warfarin, with or without low-molecular-weight heparin bridging. Dabigatran was held 24-30h pre-procedure and restarted 4-6h after hemostasis was achieved. We evaluated all thromboembolic and bleeding complications at 3months post-ablation. A total of 254 patients underwent left atrial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter. Periprocedural anticoagulation utilized dabigatran in 122 patients and warfarin in 135 patients. Three late thromboembolic complications occurred in the dabigatran group (2.5%), compared with one (0.7%) in the warfarin group (p = 0.28). The dabigatran group had similar minor bleeding (2.5 vs. 7.4%, p = 0.07), major bleeding (1.6 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.51), and composite of bleeding and thromboembolic complications (6.6 vs. 8.9%, p = 0.49) when compared to warfarin. There were no acute thromboembolic complications in either group (<24h post-ablation). In patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation for AF or left atrial flutter, use of periprocedural dabigatran etexilate provides a safe and effective anticoagulation strategy compared to warfarin. A prospective randomized study is warranted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.