Abstract
To evaluate the nursing workload related to two techniques of continuous renal replacement therapy. We analysed retrospectively the nursing work load caused directly by continuous renal replacement therapy in a cohort of patients admitted consecutively over 10 months. Two types of continuous renal replacement therapy have been compared: dialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation and haemodiafiltration with systemic heparin coagulation. Academic Hospital Intensive Care Unit. The nursing workload was defined by the time spent in the management of continuous renal replacement therapy, including preparation of the circuit and related biological controls. 60 patients underwent a total of 202 sessions of continuous renal replacement therapy. The nursing workload as expressed as % time of nursing care was similar (12.3 [9.4-18.8] vs 13.4 [11.7-17.0] %, for haemodiafiltration and dialysis respectively, P=0.06). However, the distribution of the nursing workload is different: the bigger proportion of care is circuit preparation in haemodiafiltration and biology control in dialysis. Nursing time dedicated to continuous renal replacement therapy is similar whatever the renal replacement therapy technique. However, a longer duration of the filter and a better circuit predictability with dialysis and citrate anticoagulation are potential benefits for nursing workload.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
