Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration versus standard medical therapy for the prevention of rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

AimTo determine whether continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) plus standard medical therapy (SMT) vs. SMT alone prevents rhabdomyolysis (RM)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and analyze the related health economics.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study involved 9 RM patients without AKI, coronary heart disease, or chronic kidney disease treated with CVVHDF plus SMT (CVVHDF + SMT group). Nine matched RM patients without AKI treated with SMT only served as controls (SMT group). Baseline characteristics, biochemical indexes, renal survival data, and health economic data were compared between groups. In the CVVHDF + SMT group, biochemical data were compared at different time points.ResultsAt 2 and 7 days after admission, serum biochemical indices (e.g., myoglobin, creatine kinase, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen) did not differ between the groups. Total (P = 0.011) and daily hospitalization costs (P = 0.002) were higher in the CVVHDF + SMT group than in the SMT group. After 53 months of follow-up, no patient developed increased serum creatinine, except for 1 CVVHDF + SMT-group patient who died of acute myocardial infarction. In the CVVHDF + SMT group, myoglobin levels significantly differed before and after the first CVVHDF treatment (P = 0.008), and serum myoglobin, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen decreased significantly at different time points after CVVHDF.ConclusionsAlthough CVVHDF facilitated myoglobin elimination, its addition to SMT did not improve biochemical indices like serum myoglobin, serum creatine kinase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and lactate dehydrogenase or the long-term renal prognosis. Despite similar hospitalization durations, both total and daily hospitalization costs were higher in the CVVHDF + SMT group.