Abstract

Variation in aposematic signals was once predicted to be rare, yet in recent years it has become increasingly well documented. Despite increases in the frequency with which polytypism and polymorphism have been suggested to occur, population-wide variance is rarely quantified. We comprehensively sampled a subpopulation of the poison frog Oophaga sylvatica, a species which is polytypic across its distribution and also shows considerable within-population polymorphism. On one hand, color pattern polymorphism could be the result of multifarious selection acting to balance different signaling functions and leading to the evolution of discrete sub-morphs which occupy different fitness peaks. Alternatively, variance could simply be due to relaxed selection, where variation would be predicted to be continuous. We used visual modeling of conspecific and heterospecific observers to quantify the extent of within population phenotypic variation and assess whether this variation produced distinct signals. We found that, despite considerable color pattern variation, variance could not be partitioned into distinct groups, but rather all viewers would be likely to perceive variation as continuous. Similarly, we found no evidence that frog color pattern contrast was either enhanced or diminished in the frogs’ chosen microhabitats compared to alternative patches in which conspecifics were observed. Within population phenotypic variance therefore does not seem to be indicative of strong selection toward multiple signaling strategies, but rather pattern divergence has likely arisen due to weak purifying selection, or neutral processes, on a signal that is highly salient to both conspecifics and predators.

Highlights

  • Aposematic signals evolve to convey important information related to prey defenses to potential predators (Stevens and Ruxton, 2012; Caro and Ruxton, 2019)

  • Considerable attention has been paid to how warning coloration evolves and functions (Caro and Ruxton, 2019), yet basic questions related to polymorphism and polytypism remain

  • As the majority of the frogs’ variation was found in the distribution of pattern, and as the red and black are highly distinct from the background (Yeager and Barnett, 2020; Figure 2 and Supplementary Figures 1–3), we focused on how pattern variation affects background pattern matching and distancedependent color blending by comparing the whole frog regions of interest (ROIs) to their local backgrounds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aposematic (warning) signals evolve to convey important information related to prey defenses to potential predators (Stevens and Ruxton, 2012; Caro and Ruxton, 2019). Learn, to associate certain prey characteristics with chemical or physical defenses and subsequently avoid prey bearing these signals (Stevens and Ruxton, 2012; Caro and Ruxton, 2019). We compared the mean hue, mean luminance, and pattern energy distribution of each frog to that of the microhabitat where it was first encountered (external chromatic, achromatic, and pattern contrast), and ran a series of linear models comparing each form of external contrast to Factor 1 from our factor analysis (function lm) using base R v4.0.5 (R Core Team, 2021). To test whether frogs were associated with microhabitats that either minimized or maximized the contrast of their own color and pattern characteristics we compared mean achromatic, mean chromatic, and pattern contrast between each frogs’ local microhabitat and the alternate microhabitats where the other 34. A significant result would suggest that frogs are associated with specific microhabitats

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.