Abstract

We tested the hypotheses that continuous total peripheral resistance (TPR) measurements are superior to intermittent data collection and that variables related to TPR can be used to distinguish between survivors and nonsurvivors (NS), respectively, of prolonged hemorrhagic hypotension (HH). One week after a transit-time ultrasound probe was implanted on their ascending aortas, 21 rats were subjected to 4 h of HH at 40 mmHg. Measurements were made before and up to 4 h after initiation of HH. Additional bleeding or Ringer L-lactate (RL) infusion was used to maintain HH. TPR was continuously measured online using recordings of blood flow and arterial pressure. Approximately 67% of the rats survived > or =3 h; others were considered NS. Data collected at 30-min intervals failed to detect the maximum value of TPR (TPRmax). The times to reach TPRmax were similar for survivors and NS and were strongly correlated with the bleeding end points and with the RL infusion-onset times. However, survivors showed higher TPRmax values than NS (P <0.005) and had a significantly longer period than NS during which TPR was above baseline level (116 +/- 20 vs. 51 +/- 10 min). In conclusion, 1) the transit-time ultrasound technique at high sampling rate allowed continuous and accurate real-time monitoring of TPR, 2) the bleeding end point and RL infusion-onset times may be used as surrogates of the time to TPRmax, 3) TPRmax of survivors and NS could be detected only using a continuous TPR measurement, and 4) differences between survivors and NS could be revealed by the continuous TPR curve.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call