Abstract
AbstractIn mountainous area, spring water constitutes the only drinking water resource and local economy is highly dependent on forest health and productivity. However, climate change is expected to make extreme water shortage episodes more and more frequent. Forest is therefore more and more exposed to water stress. It appears necessary to quantify the drought induced by water deficit to evaluate forest vulnerability and to plan the future of forest management. In this study we quantified the 2018 water deficit experienced by the forest in the Strengbach catchment, located in the French Vosges mountains. Three methods for estimating catchment water storage changes (WSC) have been compared. The first relies on superconducting gravimeter monitoring while the second relies on catchment water balance. The third one relies on global hydrological model MERRA2. We show that WSC estimated from measured gravity changes correlate well with WSC estimated from catchment water balance while WSC inferred from MERRA2 significantly differs. The Strengbach catchment water cycle is mostly annual but exhibits significant interannual variability associated with the 2018 drought episode: August 2018 has a water deficit of 37 mm (as inferred from catchment water balance) or 76 mm (as seen with superconducting gravimetry) compared to August 2017. We illustrate here the use of superconducting gravimeter monitoring as an independent proxy for WSC in a mountainous catchment while most of hydro-gravimetric studies have been conducted on relatively flat areas. We therefore contribute to expand the area of use of high precision gravity monitoring for the hydrological characterization of the critical zone in mountainous context. This innovative method may help to assess forest vulnerability to drought in the context of climate change.
Highlights
Spring water constitutes the only drinking water resource for villages located in the French Vosges mountains
superconducting gravimeter (SG) hydro-gravimetric signal and catchment water balance are compared in terms of water storage changes (WSC) expressed in mm of water (Fig. 3)
Considering the numerous corrections applied onto the measured gravity signal as well as the hypothesis made to convert the SG hydro-gravimetric signal into WSC, it is remarkable to have such a good agreement between WSC derived from SG monitoring and from catchment water balance
Summary
Spring water constitutes the only drinking water resource for villages located in the French Vosges mountains. There are two ways for estimating WSC at the catchment scale in mountainous areas: one may rely on local prediction from global hydrological models or on catchment water balance derived from local hydro-meteorological measurements. SG is installed on the edge of a 8.4 m 4.4 m shelter with concrete foundations but no gravimetric pillar In this way WSC occur only at a smaller altitude than the SG and every area located in the footprint of the gravimeter contribute positively to the gravity signal measured by the SG i.e. a water storage increase induces a gravity increase. This specific location maximizes the hydro-gravimetric signal and enable the use of SG hydrogravimetric signal as a proxy of local WSC. The resulting mask effect is quantified in a section
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
