Abstract
Continuous powder mixing is an important technology used in the development and manufacturing of solid oral dosage forms. Since critical quality attributes of the final product greatly depend on the performance of the mixing step, an analysis of such a process using the Discrete Element Method (DEM) is of crucial importance. On one hand, the number of expensive experimental runs can be reduced dramatically. On the other hand, numerical simulations can provide information that is very difficult to obtain experimentally. In order to apply such a simulation technology in product development and to replace experimental runs, an intensive model validation step is required. This paper presents a DEM model of the vertical continuous mixing device termed CMT (continuous mixing technology) and an extensive validation workflow. First, a cohesive contact model was calibrated in two small-scale characterization experiments: a compression test with spring-back and a shear cell test. An improved, quicker calibration procedure utilizing the previously calibrated contact models is presented. The calibration procedure is able to differentiate between the blend properties caused by different API particle sizes in the same formulation. Second, DEM simulations of the CMT were carried out to determine the residence time distribution (RTD) of the material inside the mixer. After that, the predicted RTDs were compared with the results of tracer spike experiments conducted with two blend material properties at two mass throughputs of 15 kg/h and 30 kg/h. Additionally, three hold-up masses (500, 730 and 850 g) and three impeller speeds (400, 440 and 650 rpms) were considered. Finally, both RTD datasets from DEM and tracer experiments were used to predict the damping behavior of incoming feeder fluctuations and the funnel of maximum duration and magnitude of incoming deviations that do not require a control action. The results for both tools in terms of enabling a control strategy (the fluctuation damping and the funnel plot) are in excellent agreement, indicating that DEM simulations are well suited to replace process-scale tracer spike experiments to determine the RTD.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.