Abstract

Continuous data flows complement scientific work-flows by allowing composition of real time data ingest and analytics pipelines to process data streams from pervasive sensors and always-on scientific instruments. Such data flows are mission-critical applications that cannot suffer downtime, need to operate consistently, and are long running, but may need to be updated to fix bugs or add features. This poses the problem: How do we update the continuous dataflow application with minimal disruption? In this paper, we formalize different types of dataflow update models for continuous dataflow applications, and identify the qualitative and quantitative metrics to be considered when choosing an update strategy. We propose five dataflow update strategies, and analytically characterize their performance trade-offs. We validate one of these consistent, low-latency update strategies using the Floe dataflow engine for an eEngineering application from the Smart Power Grid domain, and show its relative performance benefits against a naive update strategy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.