Abstract
In the context of continuous assessment for learning in a university course in French-speaking Switzerland, this article studies students’ perception when they receive multiple instances of peer feedback on a written academic assignment carried out in small collaborative groups. How do students, who are both assessees and assessors, perceive these multiple instances of feedback, especially when they are led to compare them to regulate their own initial work and their assessment skills? This article analyses in detail the processes and feelings at play when students notice similarities and differences between the instances of feedback they received and produced. Conceptual considerations are proposed around the notions of feedback, internal feedback, comprehensive feedback, and metafeedback, seen as contributing to the regulation and learning processes involved.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
