Abstract

BackgroundThe integration of health care has become a priority in most health systems, as patients increasingly receive care from several professionals in various different settings and institutions, particularly those with chronic conditions and multi-morbidities. Continuity of care is defined as one patient experiencing care over time as connected and coherent with his or her health needs and personal circumstances. The objective is to analyse perceptions of continuity of clinical management and information across care levels and the factors influencing it, from the viewpoint of users of the Catalan national health system.MethodsA descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted using a phenomenological approach. A two-stage theoretical sample was selected: (i) the study contexts: healthcare areas in Catalonia with different services management models; (ii) users ≥ 18 years of age who were attended to at both care levels for the same health problem. Data were collected by means of individual semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 49). All interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was conducted segmented by study area, with a mixed generation of categories and triangulation of analysts.ResultsPatients in all three areas generally perceived that continuity of clinical management across levels existed, on referring to consistent care (same diagnosis and treatment by doctors of both care levels, no incompatibilities of prescribed medications, referrals across levels when needed) and accessibility across levels (timeliness of appointments). In terms of continuity of information, patients in most areas mentioned the existence of information sharing via computer and its adequate usage. Only a few discontinuity elements were reported such as long waiting times for specific tests performed in secondary care or insufficient use of electronic medical records by locum doctors. Different factors influencing continuity were identified by patients, relating to the health system itself (clear distribution of roles between primary and secondary care), health services organizations (care coordination mechanisms, co-location, insufficient resources) and physicians (willingness to collaborate, commitment to patient care, the primary care physician’s technical competence).ConclusionsCare continuity across care levels is experienced by patients in the areas studied, with certain exceptions that highlight where there is room for improvement. Influencing factors offer valuable insights on where to direct coordination efforts.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1696-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The integration of health care has become a priority in most health systems, as patients increasingly receive care from several professionals in various different settings and institutions, those with chronic conditions and multi-morbidities

  • Receipt of consistent treatment across levels with some contradictions, duplications and missing referrals Patients across all the healthcare areas largely perceived that the care provided by their primary and secondary care physician was consistent because they received the same diagnosis, treatment and medical recommendations and did not experience any incompatibilities of prescribed medications: They check to see if one medicine is compatible with another

  • A few patients reported that the emergency doctor prescribed drugs which were different from those recommended by the primary care physician (PCP) and resulted in secondary effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The integration of health care has become a priority in most health systems, as patients increasingly receive care from several professionals in various different settings and institutions, those with chronic conditions and multi-morbidities. Conceptual discussions are ongoing, an increasing number of qualitative and quantitative studies, for example those of Cowie et al [16], Aller et al [17, 18] or Uijen et al [19], have adopted Reid et al.’s framework [4, 9] They define continuity of care as one patient experiencing care over time as connected and coherent with his or her health needs and personal circumstances [20]. Continuity of clinical management and continuity of information can be analysed across levels of care (primary and secondary care interface) and will be the focus of this article

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.