Continuity and efficacy of real-world use of azacitidine.

Abstract

Long-term azacitidine (AZA) treatment is necessary for its maximal therapeutic effect. This study examined the continuity and efficacy of AZA treatment in real-world use. We conducted a retrospective study in 38 patients who had completed AZA treatment at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital between April 2011 and August 2019. The median number of AZA received cycles was 4. The number of AZA treatment cycles received was 1-3 cycles in 15 (39.5%), 4-6 cycles in 15 (39.5%), and ≥ 7 cycles in 8 (21.1%). The most common reason for discontinued AZA treatment was infection. Overall response rate was 33.3% in patients with discontinued AZA use (< 4 cycles) and 56.5% in patients with continued AZA (≥ 4). Median overall survival (OS) was 124 (15-529) days and 391 (132-2,825) days in the respective groups (p<0.01). The presence of peripheral blood blasts (PBs) was a prognostic factor for continuation of treatment (p =0.03). Discontinued AZA treatment due to infection (p <0.01), and PBs (p =0.03) were unfavourable prognostic factors for OS. Long-term AZA use is beneficial for improvement and survival. Infection control and presence of PBs were important factors for continuing AZA. These data support the idea of long-term continued treatment with AZA for optimal benefit to patients.