Abstract
T HE CHEMICAL REVOLUTION has generally been regarded as the very paradigm of a scientific revolution. It was recognized as a revolution in its own time and has been so viewed by subsequent generations of historians and scientists. Although Joseph Priestley opposed Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier's innovations, he spoke for many of his contemporaries when, in 1796, he observed that there have been few, if any, revolutions in science so great, so sudden, and so general, as the prevalence of what is now usually termed the new system of chemistry, or that of the Antiphlogistians, over the doctrine of Stahl. Attentive to the conjunction of the Chemical Revolution with the American and French revolutions, proponents and opponents of the oxygen theory shared an exhilarating sense of living in an age of revolutions, philosophical as well as civil.' The eighteenth-century
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
