Continuing Professional Development for Radiation Oncologists: Where are the Gaps and Barriers?

Abstract

Continuing professional development (CPD) involves continuing medical education (CME), as well as educational activities to enhance research, teaching and leadership skills. Although CPD has been well explored in other specialties, the literature pertaining to radiation oncology is lacking. We sought to evaluate current CPD practices of radiation oncologists (RO) and identify unmet needs and barriers. An online survey on CPD was developed in English and French, approved by ethics board, and emailed to all RO departments across Canada. Respondents' current practices, preferences, barriers, and needs were explored across the CPD domains of CME, research, teaching and administrative skills. One-hundred twenty-four radiation oncologists completed the survey with representation across all listed disease sites and provinces. Respondents had an average 13.6 years of experience as staff (6 months to 38 years) and 96% were affiliated with a university. ROs indicated the most helpful resources for CME were reading journal articles (27%), attending tumor boards (25%), conferences (19%), informal discussion with colleagues (11%), free online websites (e.g., NCCN) (4%) and Twitter (3.5%). Lack of time was unanimously regarded as a barrier for CME. Other barriers included growing clinical workloads, expanding literature, and a lack of renumeration for CME. The mean score was 3.5/5, between "neutral" and "satisfied" for "satisfaction that CME needs are met" on a 5-point Likert scale. Seventy-six percent of respondents are currently engaged in research, with 46% involved as a research supervisor. However, only 35% had protected time for research (ranging from 10-80% FTE). Time (89%), funding (63%) and human resources (63%) were cited as barriers. Respondents wanted to improve skills in statistical analysis, clinical trial design and grant writing. Most researchers (78%) were comfortable with quantitative methodologies. Conversely, only 35% were comfortable with qualitative methods. Nearly all respondents (98%) were involved with clinical teaching. While the majority of respondents were satisfied with their teaching ability, many wanted to improve skills in coaching, providing feedback and delivering lectures. The preferred learning formats for improving these skills were either workshops at conferences or online. Half of the respondents are currently in an administrative/leadership role, and of those that are not, only 30% were interested in pursuing future leadership positions. The main barriers cited were time and the experience required. Overall satisfaction scores for current CME practices were mediocre amongst Canadian radiation oncologists - a group that is mostly in university-affiliated/academic practices with 98% involved in clinical teaching. There are notable barriers and unmet needs in research, teaching and administration - highlighting potential areas for future CPD initiatives in radiation oncology.