Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews

Abstract

Recently there has been a great deal of advice published for information systems researchers aiming to conduct standalone literature reviews, and this advice has been, at times, confusing, contradictory and contested. In this opinion paper, we harmonize and resolve some crucial elements of this debate. In our view, literature review articles need to adhere to the same high standards of quality and trustworthiness as other empirical studies. We argue that a systematic approach, accompanied by transparent reporting, is essential for positivist as well as interpretivist reviews, regardless of their specific type, scope and methods. In terms of structure, we first recap the main genres of review articles used by information systems scholars, and present a high-level framework of the steps required to develop a literature review article. For each step, we then explain how the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency should be understood and embedded in the process of developing review papers across a wide range of genres, including positivist aggregative reviews as well as interpretive syntheses using iterative, inductive and abductive approaches.