Abstract

Individuals who espouse an egalitarian gender ideology as well as economically independent women benefit from a more egalitarian division of housework. Although these two individual-level characteristics affect the gender division of housework, each suggests a different mechanism; the former is anchored within an economic logic and the latter within a cultural one. Using data of 25 countries from the 2002 and 2012 “Family and Changing Gender Roles” modules of the International Social Survey Program, we examine whether a country’s mean gender ideology and women’s labor force participation (WLFP) rate have a distinct contextual effect beyond these individual-level effects. We predict that the division of housework between married or cohabitating partners will be more egalitarian in countries with higher WLFP rates and in countries with more egalitarian attitudes, even after controlling for the two variables at the individual level. Given the cross-country convergence in WLFP, but not in gender ideology, we expect the effect of WLFP to decline over time and the effect of gender ideology to remain salient. Indeed, our multi-level analysis indicates that the net effect of WLFP, which was evident in 2002, had disappeared by 2012. By contrast, the net contextual effect of gender ideology, which was not significant in 2002, had become an important determinant of housework division by 2012. We conclude that further changes will depend on a country’s prevalent gender ideology because the equalizing effect of WLFP on the division of housework may have reached its limit.

Highlights

  • Individuals who espouse an egalitarian gender ideology as well as economically independent women benefit from a more egalitarian division of housework

  • The contextual effect of both women’s labor force participation rates (WLFP) and gender ideology may merely reflect compositional differences or it may result from a distinct contextual effect

  • The results of the very few studies that have examined the contextual effect of WLFP are inconclusive, but based on the findings of Geist and Cohen (2011) and Hook (2006), we expect the gendered division of housework to be more egalitarian in countries with high WLFP rates, even after controlling for their economic dependency (Hypothesis 1a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals who espouse an egalitarian gender ideology as well as economically independent women benefit from a more egalitarian division of housework. Most household tasks still remain in the hands of women (Altintas and Sullivan 2016; Sayer 2016) This uneven change has motivated scholars to study the gendered division of labor inside and outside the household, as well as the relationship between the two (for reviews see Coltrane 2000; Lachance-Grzela and Bouchard 2010). Two country-level factors stand at the center of our theoretical focus Both are among the most significant factors influencing the division of household labor at the individual level, but are yet to receive sufficient scholarly attention from a cross-country comparative perspective. Our theoretical motivation is to learn about the importance of country-level factors in relation to the division of housework beyond their (aggregated) effects at the individual level

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call