Contextual determinants of female–female mounting in laboratory rats

Abstract

Female–female mounting is widespread among mammalian species, but little is known about the proximal function of this behaviour. While such mounting is often regarded as a ‘masculine’ trait, its widespread occurrence may indicate that it serves specific functions within the context of female–female social behaviour. We valuated female mounting behaviour in Long–Evans rats in standard observation chambers and in a seminatural enclosure. Under these conditions, we examined a number of potential factors that might influence mounting, including the oestrous cycle, social hierarchy, familiarity and male presence. The female’s mounting was not influenced by her own oestrous cycle, but did vary with the oestrous cycle of the stimulus female. Socially dominant females mounted significantly more than subordinate females, and mounting by the dominant female was most frequent when the subordinate female was sexually receptive. Females mounted (and fought with) unfamiliar females significantly more than they did with familiar cagemates. Female–female mounting was dramatically reduced when males were present. Further testing showed that female mounting did not affect the induction of the progestational state of pregnancy, suggesting that female mounting does not function as a pseudomale behaviour that can substitute for genital stimulation provided by the male. Based on these data, female mounting does not appear to function as a sexual behaviour per se, but may serve as a form of female social behaviour related to maintenance of the female’s social status within female groups. In this regard, the results of this study suggest that female mounting is part of the normal female’s complex behavioural repertoire and does not necessarily reflect masculinization of some underlying neural substrate.