Abstract
In a series of experiments (Eimas, Hornstein, & Payton, Journal of Memory and Language, 1990, 29, 160–180) , secondary tasks that required lexical knowledge induced lexical effects on phoneme monitoring times when the target-bearing items were presented in isolation. Lexical effects were not found in the absence of secondary tasks. In the present series of experiments in which the same target-bearing items were embedded in sentential contexts, lexical effects were not obtained with or without a secondary task. A word frequency effect was obtained, however, when target-bearing words were embedded in incoherent contexts composed of randomly ordered word strings, but only when a secondary task was required. The influence of sentential coherence and processing demands and their relation to the focus of attention during phoneme monitoring was discussed along with the role of lexical knowledge on the formation of a prelexical, presumably phonetic code during perception of connected speech.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.