Abstract

Assistants serve an essential role in special education to support children with disabilities, but they should be properly trained and supervised. The coaching approach represents one trend that has been gradually implemented in occupational therapy (OT) and rehabilitation services. Still, few studies clearly define the coaching intervention, measure the fidelity of coaching practices, or evaluate capacity building of the caregivers in the long term. This quasi-experimental study compared one-on-one coaching in natural environments following a workshop with a training workshop. Both public schools do not have regular OT services. The primary outcome was the assistant’s performance, measured with the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). The secondary outcome was the fidelity of coaching implementation, measured with the Coaching Practices Rating Scale (CPRS). The GAS showed an increased performance of the assistants after the intervention, with significant differences between groups post-intervention (p = 0.015) and large effect size (r = 0.55), but no long-term significant improvements were found at the follow-up (p = 0.072). The CPRS showed an adequate implementation of the five coaching components (joint planning, observation, action, reflection, and feedback), with a total score of 3.5 ± 0.72 (mean ± SD). The results suggest that coaching sessions provided by OTs in schools may improve assistants’ skills to facilitate the student’s participation.

Highlights

  • Functional independence in self-care activities is crucial to ensure community participation of people with severe/multiple disabilities [1]

  • There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, gender, marital status, or educational level

  • Our study shows that a coaching approach provided by occupational therapy (OT) in schools may improve assistants’ skills to facilitate children’s participation in daily occupations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Functional independence in self-care activities is crucial to ensure community participation of people with severe/multiple disabilities [1]. Focusing on occupations and eliminating environmental barriers or creating facilitators may have a greater impact on the promotion of the students’ participation, since some personal characteristics may not be modifiable, unlike other environmental factors [3,4,5]. For this reason, recent studies have highlighted that these occupational therapy (OT) interventions should consider all the person–occupation–. OT’s best practices in school demand the adoption of an ecological approach [8], school-based OTs seem to prefer direct intervention in separate settings, in stark contrast to current research, which recommends working through collaborative, consultative, and contextual models [5,9,10,11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call