Abstract

Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that has received considerable attention in allopathic medicine over the past decades. However, it is clear that, to date, pharmacological and surgical interventions do not fully address symptoms of PD and patients’ quality of life. As both an alternative therapy and as an adjuvant to conventional approaches, several types of rhythmic movement (e.g., movement strategies, dance, tandem biking, and Tai Chi) have shown improvements to motor symptoms, lower limb control, and postural stability in people with PD (1–6). However, while these programs are increasing in number, still little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying motor improvements attained with such interventions. Studying limb motor control under task-specific contexts can help determine the mechanisms of rehabilitation effectiveness. Both internally guided (IG) and externally guided (EG) movement strategies have evidence to support their use in rehabilitative programs. However, there appears to be a degree of differentiation in the neural substrates involved in IG vs. EG designs. Because of the potential task-specific benefits of rhythmic training within a rehabilitative context, this report will consider the use of IG and EG movement strategies, and observations produced by functional magnetic resonance imaging and other imaging techniques. This review will present findings from lower limb imaging studies, under IG and EG conditions for populations with and without movement disorders. We will discuss how these studies might inform movement disorders rehabilitation (in the form of rhythmic, music-based movement training) and highlight research gaps. We believe better understanding of lower limb neural activity with respect to PD impairment during rhythmic IG and EG movement will facilitate the development of novel and effective therapeutic approaches to mobility limitations and postural instability.

Highlights

  • Specialty section: This article was submitted to Movement Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

  • Finding An upper extremity task reveals differential striatocortical involvement for successful movements with Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with and without freezing of gait (FOG) Our results show that the putamen is involved in the execution of non-routine movements, especially if those are self-initiated Compared to PD patients, healthy adults showed greater activation of supplementary motor cortex (SMA) and anterior cingulate, left putamen, left insular cortex, right DLPFC, and right parietal area 40 During externally guided (EG), the hMT/V5+, the superior parietal cortex, the premotor cortex, the thalamus, and cerebellar lobule VI showed higher activation

  • As with the case of deep brain stimulation, suppression of abnormal downstream network activity produced by the malfunctioning basal ganglia may result from stimulating the subthalamic nucleus [139]

Read more

Summary

12 Healthy young

Imagery and execution of EG movement execution and motor imagery shared a common network, including the ankle dorsiflexion premotor, parietal and cingulate cortices, the striatum, and the cerebellum [24]. During IG: the basal ganglia, the SMA, cingulate motor cortex, the inferior parietal, frontal operculum, and cerebellar lobule IV–V/dentate nucleus showed increased activity PD patients showed increased recruitment of ipsilateral CTC circuit during EG task than healthy older adults Differential activation between PD and older adults during synchronous movements Eg movement showed decreased activation in the M1S1, cerebellum, and medial premotor system in PD subjects compared to healthy controls IG: anterior basal ganglia more heavily recruited; EG: cerebellum more heavily recruited Differential recruitment of CBGT and CTC circuits respective of mapping of “what” or “when” during IG vs EG tasks literature can inform. Finger flexion during positron emission tomography Phasic movements of hand vs. foot

PD and 5 age-matched healthy
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call