Abstract
A big question in behavioral ecology is what drives diversity of color signals. One possible explanation is that environmental conditions, such as light environment, may alter visual signaling of prey, which could affect predator decision-making. Here, we tested the context-dependent predator selection on prey coloration. In the first experiment, we tested detectability of artificial visual stimuli to blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) by manipulating stimulus luminance and chromatic context of the background. We expected the presence of the chromatic context to facilitate faster target detection. As expected, blue tits found targets on chromatic yellow background faster than on achromatic grey background whereas in the latter, targets were found with smaller contrast differences to the background. In the second experiment, we tested the effect of two light environments on the survival of aposematic, color polymorphic wood tiger moth (Arctia plantaginis). As luminance contrast should be more detectable than chromatic contrast in low light intensities, we expected birds, if they find the moths aversive, to avoid the white morph which is more conspicuous than the yellow morph in low light (and vice versa in bright light). Alternatively, birds may attack first moths that are more detectable. We found birds to attack yellow moths first in low light conditions, whereas white moths were attacked first more frequently in bright light conditions. Our results show that light environments affect predator foraging decisions, which may facilitate context-dependent selection on visual signals and diversity of prey phenotypes in the wild.
Highlights
Visual signaling can powerfully shape the outcomes of sexual, social, and natural selection (Maynard Smith and Harper 2003; Stevens 2013; Cronin et al 2014)
Experiment 2 To test if birds’ preference regarding attacking one of the two differently colored moths depended on the light environment being simulated, we analyzed the data from the behavioral assays using generalized linear mixed models with a binomial error distribution
The vision model results were not sensitive enough to detect noticeable changes in perceived contrasts with respect to experimental irradiance despite our results show that light environments may change predator decision making
Summary
Visual signaling can powerfully shape the outcomes of sexual, social, and natural selection (Maynard Smith and Harper 2003; Stevens 2013; Cronin et al 2014). We used the Wood tiger moth (Arctia plantaginis, Erebidae: Arctiinae) as our model prey This species has distinctive wing color morphs that its bird predators can detect (Henze et al 2018), it produces defensive chemicals eliciting predator avoidance, which justifies its status as an aposematic organism (Nokelainen et al 2012; Hegna et al 2013; Burdfield-Steel et al 2018; Rönkä et al 2018a). Provided that birds have completed avoidance learning on conspicuous, defended prey (Rönkä et al 2018b), we expected shady conditions to hamper yellow warning signal efficacy (i.e., to get more attacks); in higher-light intensities, on the other hand, chromatic warning signals should work better (i.e., and to get less attacks). We expected the opposite pattern (i.e., yellow signals being attacked more often in shady conditions, and the opposite in high light intensity) if attacks are more dependent on sheer prey detectability
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.