Abstract

Tactile perception is inhibited during movement execution, a phenomenon known as tactile suppression. Here, we investigated whether the type of movement determines whether or not this form of sensory suppression occurs. Participants performed simple reaching or exploratory movements. Tactile discrimination thresholds were calculated for vibratory stimuli delivered to participants' wrists while executing the movement, and while at rest (a tactile discrimination task, TD). We also measured discrimination performance in a same vs. different task for the explored materials during the execution of the different movements (a surface discrimination task, SD). The TD and SD tasks could either be performed singly or together, both under active movement and passive conditions. Consistent with previous results, tactile thresholds measured at rest were significantly lower than those measured during both active movement and passive touch (that is, tactile suppression was observed). Moreover, SD performance was significantly better under conditions of single-tasking, active movements, as well as exploratory movements, as compared to conditions of dual-tasking, passive movements, and reaching movements, respectively. Therefore, the present results demonstrate that when active hand movements are made with the purpose of gaining information about the surface properties of different materials an enhanced perceptual performance is observed. As such, it would appear that tactile suppression occurs for irrelevant tactual features during both reaching and exploratory movements, but not for those task-relevant features that result from action execution during tactile exploration. Taken together, then, these results support a context-dependent modulation of tactile suppression during movement execution.

Highlights

  • In order to achieve our goals in everyday life, we constantly move and interact with the environment; That is, we frequently perform goal-directed actions

  • With regard to the tactile vibratory discrimination task (TD task) when performed at rest, the results indicated a significant effect of the type of task, F(2, 14) = 18.95, p < 0.001

  • OF TD TASK PERFORMANCE Given previous experimental results on tactile suppression during the execution of goal-directed reach-to-grasp movements (Juravle et al, 2010, 2011), it was hypothesized that increased tactile thresholds would be observed for the active goal-directed reaching movements, as well as for exploratory movements, as compared to thresholds measured in a control no-movement condition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to achieve our goals in everyday life, we constantly move and interact with the environment; That is, we frequently perform goal-directed actions. By using simple detection and discrimination paradigms, researchers have provided evidence to suggest that tactile perception changes over the execution phase of goaldirected movements: Tactile sensitivity declines significantly over the execution phase of a movement (Buckingham et al, 2010; Gallace et al, 2010; Juravle et al, 2010; Juravle and Spence, 2011), while tactile stimuli are detected more rapidly (Juravle et al, 2011) Such findings suggest that two psychologically-grounded mechanisms (one of attentional facilitation and the other of suppression) may work in parallel over the execution phase of a planned movement. To the best of our knowledge, there are no experimental accounts in the literature that have attempted to contrast the characteristics of tactile perception during the execution of reaching movements with the execution of exploratory movements

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call