Abstract

Repeatability of behavioural and physiological traits is increasingly a focus for animal researchers, for which fish have become important models. Almost all of this work has been done in the context of evolutionary ecology, with few explicit attempts to apply repeatability and context dependency of trait variation toward understanding conservation-related issues. Here, we review work examining the degree to which repeatability of traits (such as boldness, swimming performance, metabolic rate and stress responsiveness) is context dependent. We review methods for quantifying repeatability (distinguishing between within-context and across-context repeatability) and confounding factors that may be especially problematic when attempting to measure repeatability in wild fish. Environmental factors such temperature, food availability, oxygen availability, hypercapnia, flow regime and pollutants all appear to alter trait repeatability in fishes. This suggests that anthropogenic environmental change could alter evolutionary trajectories by changing which individuals achieve the greatest fitness in a given set of conditions. Gaining a greater understanding of these effects will be crucial for our ability to forecast the effects of gradual environmental change, such as climate change and ocean acidification, the study of which is currently limited by our ability to examine trait changes over relatively short time scales. Also discussed are situations in which recent advances in technologies associated with electronic tags (biotelemetry and biologging) and respirometry will help to facilitate increased quantification of repeatability for physiological and integrative traits, which so far lag behind measures of repeatability of behavioural traits.

Highlights

  • Cite as: Killen SS, Adriaenssens B, Marras S, Claireaux G, Cooke SJ (2016) Context dependency of trait repeatability and its relevance for management and conservation of fish populations

  • ‘is it not true that if you want to address the interindividual variability, you have to look at the intraindividual variability first? the only thing that remains beyond intraindividual variability is true interindividual variability.’

  • In its simplest form, repeatability is expressed as the proportion of total variance for a trait explained by between-individual differences, calculated as the intraclass correlation coefficient and denoted by R (Lessells and Boag, 1987; Nakagawa and Schielzeth, 2010); R can be calculated from variances partitioned using single-factor ANOVA or linear mixed models and estimates the agreement or reproducibility of absolute measurement values

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Such work has documented a large degree of among-individual variation for numerous physiological (e.g. metabolic rate and aerobic scope) and associated integrative traits (e.g. locomotion ability and susceptibility to environmental change) as well as behavioural traits (e.g. boldness, activity and aggression). This variation is crucial as the raw material for natural selection, but for a trait to be a determinant of individual fitness, it must be heritable and stable (i.e. repeatable) over a time consistent with the intensity and nature of the selective pressure experienced. Freshwater and marine fish provide numerous ecosystem services (Holmlund and Hammer, 1999) yet face numerous threats (e.g. overharvest, habitat alteration, environmental change and invasive species) that make them of great interest to resource managers and conservation practitioners

Methods for calculating repeatability
Method
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call