Abstract

Context dependency occurs when biological interactions shift in sign or magnitude depending upon genetic, abiotic, and biotic context. Most models of mutualism address systems where interaction outcomes slide along a mutualism-antagonism continuum as environmental conditions vary altering cost-benefit relationships. However, these models do not apply to the many mutualisms that involve by-product benefits and others that do not have antagonistic alternate states. The ubiquity of such mutualisms indicates a need for different approaches and models to understand how environmental variability influences their strength, stability, and ecological roles. In this paper, we apply the concept of context dependency to mutualisms among bark beetles and fungi that span a variety of life strategies and exposures to environmental variability. Bark beetles and their mutualist fungi co-construct a niche based on by-product benefits that allows them to exist in a resource that is otherwise intractable or inaccessible. For the closest of these partnerships, this has resulted in some of the most influential agents of forest mortality in conifer forests worldwide. Understanding these symbioses is key to understanding their influence on forest structure and dynamics and responses to change. We found no evidence that bark beetle mutualisms change in sign as conditions vary, only in magnitude, and that the “closest” (and most environmentally influential) of these partnerships have evolved behaviors and mechanisms to reduce context-dependency and stabilize benefit delivery. The bark beetle-fungus symbioses most likely to slide along a mutualism-antagonism continuum are those involving loosely associated facultative symbionts that may provide benefits under some circumstances and that are horizontally transmitted by the beetle host. Additionally, some symbiotic fungi are never mutualists – these “third party” fungi are exploiters and may shift from commensalism to antagonism depending on environmental context. Our assessment indicates that a careful differentiation between bark beetle-fungus partnerships is crucial to understanding how they influence forests and respond to environmental variability.

Highlights

  • Context dependency, the concept that outcomes of biological interactions shift in sign or magnitude depending upon genetic, abiotic, and biotic context, is core to understanding how interspecific interactions function and how they influence community dynamics and stability

  • We present descriptions of the various types of bark beetle-fungus symbioses and discuss evidence for or against context dependency in their outcomes

  • If different genotypes respond to abiotic or biotic contexts in disparate ways, this can result in differential provisioning of benefits

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The concept that outcomes of biological interactions shift in sign or magnitude depending upon genetic, abiotic, and biotic context, is core to understanding how interspecific interactions function and how they influence community dynamics and stability. Biotic context encompasses all the organisms that the mutualism interacts with directly or indirectly including host plants for herbivores, other symbionts or hosts, predators, parasitoids, and competitors These are termed third-party effects and they can have substantial consequences for symbiotic outcomes. If different genotypes respond to abiotic or biotic contexts in disparate ways, this can result in differential provisioning of benefits Such genetically based variability provides the potential and foundation for directional selection on mutualism traits (Hoeksma and Bruna, 2015; Stoy et al, 2020). Selection over time is expected to reduce genetic variability by removing all but the best partner genotype(s) (Hoeksma and Bruna, 2015) While this has been observed in many co-evolved mutualisms, it is not always the case (van de Peppel and Aanen, 2020). Many factors have the potential to influence outcomes in mutualisms

Background on the Partners
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call