Abstract

Low-value care contributes to poor quality of care and wasteful spending in healthcare systems. In Verkerk and colleagues' recent qualitative study, interviews with low-value care experts from Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands identified a broad range of nationally relevant social, system, and knowledge factors that promote ongoing use of low-value care. These factors highlight the complexity of the problem that is persistent use of low-value care and how it is heavily influenced by public and medical culture as well as healthcare system features. This commentary discusses how these findings integrate within current low-value care and de-implementation literature and uses specific low-value care examples to highlight the importance of considering context, culture, and clinical setting when considering how to apply these factors to future de-implementation initiatives.

Highlights

  • De-implementing low-value care is a major challenge within healthcare systems around the world.[1]

  • While we have established theories, models, and frameworks to guide the process of implementing high-value care into practice, less is known about the process of de-implementing low-value care

  • Despite advancements in our understanding of de-implementation, low-value care remains a major burden within healthcare systems throughout the world

Read more

Summary

Introduction

De-implementing low-value care is a major challenge within healthcare systems around the world.[1].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call