Abstract

In India’s Eastern Himalayan State of Sikkim, the indigenous Bhutia communities, Lachungpas and Lachenpas, successfully contested all proposed hydropower projects and have managed to sustain an anti-dam opposition in their home regions, Lachung and Lachen. In this paper, we discuss this remarkable, un-researched, effective collective action against hydropower development, examining how identity and territory influence collective action through production, creation and application of vernacular knowledge systems. The role of the Dzumsa, a prevailing traditional system of self-governance among the Lachungpas and Lachenpas, has been central in their collective resistance against large dams in Lachung and Lachen. Our findings show that contrary to popular imageries, the Dzumsa is neither an egalitarian nor a democratic institution—rather, it is an exercise of an “agonistic unity”. The Dzumsas operate as complex collectives, which serve to politicize identity, decision-making and place-based territoriality in their struggle against internal and external threats. Principles of a “vernacular statecraft” helped bringing the local communities together in imperfect unions to oppose modernist designs of hydropower development. However, while such vernacular institutions were able to construct a powerful local adversary to neoliberal agendas, they also pose high social, political and emotional risks to the few within the community, who chose not to align with the normative principles of the collective.

Highlights

  • Since 2003, over 168 large dams for hydropower development have been proposed in the EasternHimalayan Region of India [1,2]

  • We look at how hydropower development threatened the agonistic union of this traditional self-governing body and how the Dzumsa members resorted to ‘vernacular statecraft’

  • The Lachungpas and the Lachenpas were deeply concerned about how these new developments would impact upon territoriality—the defense of place, of place-based institutions and the community’s unique collective identity as well as their meanings, values and modes of living and knowing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since 2003, over 168 large dams for hydropower development have been proposed in the Eastern. Himalayan Region of India [1,2]. The push for hydropower development in the north-eastern region of India (see Figure 1) by both Central and State Governments, have made these developments highly conflict prone [1,3,4]. India [5,6,7,8], often characterized by prolonged struggles between dam opponents and proponents. We discuss how traditional systems and practices of shamanism (Chya) coercively bring back dissenters to “agnostic unity”. The local imposition of collective territoriality and identity notions (deploying, amongst others, fear-driven practices as the Chya)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.