Abstract

This article focuses on the precarious generation protesting in Spain and Italy in times of crisis and austerity (2010-2012). Their many similarities notwithstanding, the two countries have experienced different types of mobilization against austerity measures. In Spain, a relatively autonomous mobilization –characterized by new collective actors and new forms of action– has made possible the building of a political actor, Podemos, able to seriously challenge the established political parties. In Italy, instead, the mobilization was dominated by established political actors, especially trade unions, did not produce innovative forms of action and has not been able to overcome (so far) the fragmentation of the social movement sector. In both countries, however, the anti-austerity protests have been characterized by a strong presence of what we call hear the “precarious generation”, particularly exposed to the economic crisis and the austerity measures. By relying on data from several surveys conducted in demonstrations on social, economic and labor issues in the two countries from 2010 to 2011, in this article we single out differences and the similarities in terms of presence, social composition, grievances and emotion, collective identity and network embeddedness of the precarious generation. Our findings show that the precarious generation was almost equally present in the selected demonstrations in the two countries, share similar socio-graphic features and similar types of grievance and emotions. Nonetheless, in Spain it seems to have built a more cohesive and radical collective identity based upon a more informal and internet based network integration while in Italy it seems embedded in a more traditional and formal network, which prevented the formation of a strong collective identity. Moreover, while in Spain the differences between the older and the precarious generation reveal that, both have a strong identity based on different networks; more formal the older and more related to informal and online instruments the latter; in Italy, the older generation has a much stronger collective identity based on a organizational network, while the precarious one is less but still integrated in organizational network. We conclude that the more autonomous civil society tradition in Spain, together with the particular political opportunities, under the pressure of a harsher economic crisis, may account for the differences we found.

Highlights

  • E Massimiliano Andretta y Donatella della Porta economic crisis and the austerity measures

  • While in Spain the differences between the older and the precarious generation reveal that, both have a strong identity based on different networks; more formal the older and more related to informal and online instruments the latter; in Italy, the older generation has a much stronger collective identity based on a organizational network, while the precarious one is less but still integrated in organizational network

  • If we look at its presence across the types of demonstrations, we see that while in Italy the precarious generation concentrated in what we called “Youth against the crisis” type (80.5% vs. 60.5% in Spain), in Spain it participated more in the other types: if in the “anti-neoliberal” type it was almost present in the two countries, the Spanish precarious generation constituted about 46% of the “anti-austerity” demonstrators, and as much as 32% in the traditional “May First Day”, against only 10% in Italy

Read more

Summary

ANTI-AUSTERITY PROTESTS IN SPAIN AND ITALY

While anti-austerity protests in the years 2000s were important in both countries, they took different characteristics. The tensions in the social movements’ organizational field were built around some main cleavages between the global justice generation and an emerging anti-austerity generation; as well as between different movement coalitions that had grown around the mobilisation of the preceding three years, especially involving students, steelworkers and grassroots environmental committees. Around these cleavages, a complex web of misunderstandings, tensions and internal struggles developed during the whole summer, jeopardizing attempts at building formal or informal structures of organisation towards October 15th (della Porta and Zamponi, 2013). We will summarize the most important findings and suggest some tentative explanations

THE EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
GRIEVANCES AND EMOTIONS IN THE PRECARIOUS GENERATION
PRECARIOUS GENERATION: A COLLECTIVE IDENTITY?
NETWORKS AND EMBEDDEDNESS OF THE PRECARIOUS GENERATION
Findings
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call