Abstract
Assessing obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) in paediatric populations is complex, and a number of scales have been developed or validated for this purpose. As is the case with instruments measuring other mental health disorders, it is often assumed that youth OCD scales assess the same construct and can be used interchangeably. However, the extent to which this is true is unknown. One way to assess this – beyond calculating convergent validity – is to measure the extent of content overlap between scales. In the current paper, we apply a recently-developed method of content overlap analysis to a set of freely-available, self-report instruments for OCD measurement that were developed for or validated in paediatric populations. We found a high level of heterogeneity among scales purportedly assessing the same construct. Implications for clinical practice and research are discussed, as well as what further research is required.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.