Abstract
Six categories of content interrogatives (roughly, wh-forms) are distinguished in a representative sample of 50 languages, namely those eliciting individuals (x), locations (l), times (t), manners (m), quantities (q) and reasons (r), using categories recognized in Functional Discourse Grammar. The hypothesis is examined that, on the assumption that the named categories show increasing cognitive complexity, there will be parallel degrees of system, item and signal complexity, such that an implicational hierarchy can be formulated. It is demonstrated that item complexity (judged by phonemic weight) does gradually increase from x to r, with only time (t) deviating from this pattern. However, a correlation with system complexity is confirmed only for the extremes of the proposed hierarchy, and cognitive complexity is shown to have only limited impact upon signal complexity, i.e. morphosyntactic relatedness. Some suggestions are put forward to explain the imperfect corroboration of the hypothesis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
