Abstract
Abstract Purpose This study attempts to disclose the characteristics of knowledge integration in an interdisciplinary field by looking into the content aspect of knowledge. Design/methodology/approach The eHealth field was chosen in the case study. Associated knowledge phrases (AKPs) that are shared between citing papers and their references were extracted from the citation contexts of the eHealth papers by applying a stem-matching method. A classification schema that considers the functions of knowledge in the domain was proposed to categorize the identified AKPs. The source disciplines of each knowledge type were analyzed. Quantitative indicators and a co-occurrence analysis were applied to disclose the integration patterns of different knowledge types. Findings The annotated AKPs evidence the major disciplines supplying each type of knowledge. Different knowledge types have remarkably different integration patterns in terms of knowledge amount, the breadth of source disciplines, and the integration time lag. We also find several frequent co-occurrence patterns of different knowledge types. Research limitations The collected articles of the field are limited to the two leading open access journals. The stem-matching method to extract AKPs could not identify those phrases with the same meaning but expressed in words with different stems. The type of Research Subject dominates the recognized AKPs, which calls on an improvement of the classification schema for better knowledge integration analysis on knowledge units. Practical implications The methodology proposed in this paper sheds new light on knowledge integration characteristics of an interdisciplinary field from the content perspective. The findings have practical implications on the future development of research strategies in eHealth and the policies about interdisciplinary research. Originality/value This study proposed a new methodology to explore the content characteristics of knowledge integration in an interdisciplinary field.
Highlights
In recent years, many major scientific research problems are complex and cannot be solved by a single field
This study proposed a new methodology to explore the content characteristics of knowledge integration in an interdisciplinary field
We introduce several indicators to measure the integration characteristics of different types of knowledge based on the identified Associated knowledge phrases (AKPs)
Summary
Many major scientific research problems are complex and cannot be solved by a single field. Interdisciplinary research (IDR) has gradually become an essential mode in modern science, and received extensive attention from researchers and policymakers (Porter et al, 2006; Wagner et al, 2011; Xu et al., 2016; Xu et al, 2018). Interdisciplinary research that integrates knowledge units, such as theories, techniques, and data, from multiple research bodies of specialized knowledge or research practice (Porter et al, 2006), could create a holistic view or stimulate new ideas to solve complicated scientific problems. Knowledge integration is of nature an important phenomenon in IDR. Current studies have investigated the knowledge integration of interdisciplinary research from various perspectives. Current studies have investigated the knowledge integration of interdisciplinary research from various perspectives. Porter et al (2007) proposed an “integration”
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
