Abstract

A common problem in establishing the construct validity of self-report inventories is the confounding of the purported meaning of test scores with response styles such as social desirability. Partial correlation is a traditional method of controlling such confounding effects. This paper demonstrates the analytic and interpretive advantages of using canonical correlation to remove the effects of a confounding variable. To this end, the present study examined the test protocols of 64 male inpatient alcoholics to determine whether a general measure of mental health (Sulliman Scale of Social Interest) was related to inventories that assess psychopathology (MMPI and PSI) beyond what one could expect by Ss responding in a socially desirable manner. The results of partial correlation and canonical correlation analysis were contrasted, which demonstrated the spuriousness of partial correlations in controlling for social desirability.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call