Abstract
Introduction.In modern society, there is a growing demand for the spread of prosocial practices, among which the leading role is given to the volunteer movement. In this regard, the actual pedagogical task is the education of a prosocial person - a member of the public, whose activity is focused on the gratuitous societal service and is resulted from altruistic motives. Students are potential members, who can be involved in such activities. Student community is considered as a special social group, which is characterised by the highest degree of civic activity, the desire for self-organisation and self-realisation in various spheres of life.Theaimsof the research presented in the article are to identify and analyse the attitude of youth to different types of volunteering; to justify the need for support and development of the volunteer movement as one of the main conditions for the safe and sustainable existence of society.Methodology and research methods.The research was based on personal and socio-cognitive approaches to the process of education of the new generation, as well as on the key provisions of the theory of social security. The methods of focus group research, interviews, questionnaires and Internet surveys were employed as tools for information collection. The data obtained were generalised and processed using qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis, including content analysis, percentage analysis, correlation analysis through Pearson coefficient and factor analysis (principal component method, varimax rotation). The calculations were made with the use of the statistical software package SPPS 17.Results and scientific novelty.The phenomenon of volunteering is considered as an important factor of social solidarity and social trust and as a form of safe prosocial behaviour of the individual. Based on the responses of respondents, who took part in the surveys, typical ideas about the motivation of the volunteer, his or her personal qualities and conditions of familiarising with various volunteer practices are identified, studied and generalised. The authors built up a psychological profile of a modern young man, capable of voluntary selfless acts for the benefit of others. Three groups of factors of formation of prosocial behaviour in the youth environment are allocated: social and ecological, educational and civil, cultural and religious. The types of volunteer activities are ranked according to the degree of their influence on the social well-being of the people around them in society according to the potential of gratuitous benefit for other people. From the perspective of the Russian Government and student community, it was revealed that there are some differences in assessing the potential of volunteerism in terms of the importance of selfless actions that contribute to human well-being in society. Conflicting priorities defined by the survey participants, and, the range of activities proclaimed in the Concept of development of volunteerism (volunteering) in the Russian Federation until 2025, can be connected with students’ insufficient awareness on voluntary projects or can be indicative for the risks of socialisation of young people.Practical significance.The present research, on the one hand, enriches the field of knowledge about the essence of safe prosocial behaviour of the individual and, on the other hand, this study has a practice-oriented significance, as it can serve as a basis for the development of methods of psychological and pedagogical impact on the development of human readiness for prosocial behaviour, implemented through voluntary activity.
Highlights
the leading role is given to the volunteer movement
the actual pedagogical task is the education of a prosocial person
whose activity is focused on the gratuitous societal service
Summary
ǼȝȩȠȜȚ ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ ȒȓȭȠȓșȪțȜȟȠȖ ȜȏșȎȒȎșȎ șȖȦȪ ȝȭȠȎȭ ȥȎȟȠȪ ȞȓȟȝȜțȒȓțȠȜȐ (22,6%). ǿȞȓȒȖ ȚȡȔȥȖț ȜȘȎȕȎșȜȟȪ ȏȜșȪȦȓ ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȜȐ, ȥȓȚ ȟȞȓȒȖ ȔȓțȧȖț (27,1% ȝȞȜȠȖȐ 21,5%). 54,5% ȜȝȞȜȦȓțțȩȣ ȑșȎȐțȩȚ ȚȜȠȖȐȜȚ ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ ȒȓȭȠȓșȪțȜȟȠȖ țȎȕȩȐȎȬȠ ȝȜȠȞȓȏțȜȟȠȪ ȝȜȚȜȑȎȠȪ, 27,1% ȡȐȓȞȓțȩ, ȥȠȜ ȟȡȧȓȟȠȐȓțțȩȚ ȎȟȝȓȘȠȜȚ ȚȜȠȖȐȎȤȖȖ ȭȐșȭȓȠȟȭ ȒȜȟȠȎȠȜȥțȜȓ ȘȜșȖȥȓȟȠȐȜ ȟȐȜȏȜȒțȜȑȜ ȐȞȓȚȓțȖ. ǼȒȖțȎȘȜȐȜȓ ȘȜșȖȥȓȟȠȐȜ ȞȓȟȝȜțȒȓțȠȜȐ (ȝȜ 9%) ȝȜșȎȑȎȬȠ, ȥȠȜ ȜȠȟȡȠȟȠȐȖȓ ȚȎȠȓȞȖȎșȪțȜȗ ȐȜȕȚȜȔțȜȟȠȖ, ȟȠȖȚȡșȎ Ȗ ȐȜȕțȎȑȞȎȔȒȓțȖȭ ȠȎȘȔȓ ȚȓȦȎȬȠ ȞȓȎșȖȕȎȤȖȖ ȟȓȏȭ Ȑ ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ ȒȓȭȠȓșȪțȜȟȠȖ. ǾȜȑșȎȟțȜ ȖȠȜȑȎȚ ȜȝȞȜȟȎ, ȝȜȏȡȔȒȎȠȪ Ș ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ ȒȓȭȠȓșȪțȜȟȠȖ ȚȜȑȡȠ ȚȜȞȎșȪțȩȗ ȒȜșȑ Ȗ ȟȜȥȡȐȟȠȐȖȓ Ȗ ȟȐȭȕȎțțȩȓ ȟ țȖȚȖ ȖȒȓȎșȖȟȠȖȥȓȟȘȖȓ ȚȜȠȖȐȩ: ȔȓșȎțȖȓ ȟȝȜȟȜȏȟȠȐȜȐȎȠȪ ȖȕȚȓțȓțȖȭȚ Ȑ ȜȏȧȓȟȠȐȓ, ȏȩȠȪ ȟȜȤȖȎșȪțȜ ȝȜșȓȕțȩȚ, ȝȜȚȜȑȎȠȪ țȡȔȒȎȬȧȖȚȟȭ, ȜȠȐȓȥȎȠȪ țȎ ȒȜȏȞȜ ȒȜȏȞȜȚ, ȡșȡȥȦȎȠȪ ȏșȎȑȜȝȜșȡȥȖȓ ȒȞȡȑȜȑȜ ȥȓșȜȐȓȘȎ. ǼȞȓȒȝȜȥȠȓțȖȭ Ȑ ȐȩȏȜȞȓ ȟȠȡȒȓțȠȎȚȖ ȐȖȒȜȐ ȝȞȜȟȜȤȖȎșȪțȜȑȜ ȝȜȐȓȒȓțȖȭ (ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ ȒȓȭȠȓșȪțȜȟȠȖ). ǼȠȐȓȠȩ țȎ ȐȜȝȞȜȟ: «ȅȠȜ ȚȜȔȓȠ ȏȓȟȘȜȞȩȟȠțȜ ȒȓșȎȠȪ ȥȓșȜȐȓȘ, ȥȠȜȏȩ ȟȝȜȟȜȏȟȠȐȜȐȎȠȪ ȏșȎȑȜȝȜșȡȥȖȬ șȬȒȓȗ Ȑ ȜȏȧȓȟȠȐȓ?» – ȝȜȕȐȜșȖșȖ ȝȞȜȞȎțȔȖȞȜȐȎȠȪ ȐȖȒȩ ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ ȒȓȭȠȓșȪțȜȟȠȖ, Ȑ țȎȖȏȜșȪȦȓȗ ȟȠȓȝȓțȖ ȐșȖȭȬȧȖȓ țȎ ȏșȎȑȜȟȜȟȠȜȭțȖȓ ȜȏȧȓȟȠȐȎ, ȟ ȠȜȥȘȖ ȕȞȓțȖȭ ȟȠȡȒȓțȠȜȐ, Ȗ, ȟșȓȒȜȐȎȠȓșȪțȜ, țȎȖȏȜșȓȓ ȝȞȖȜȞȖȠȓȠțȩȓ Ȑ ȚȜșȜȒȓȔțȜȗ ȟȞȓȒȓ. ǼȞȓȒȝȜȥȠȓțȖȭ (ȞȎțȑȖ) Ȑ ȐȩȏȜȞȓ ȟȠȡȒȓțȠȎȚȖ ȐȖȒȜȐ ȝȞȜȟȜȤȖȎșȪțȜȑȜ ȝȜȐȓȒȓțȖȭ (ȐȜșȜțȠȓȞȟȘȜȗ ȒȓȭȠȓșȪțȜȟȠȖ). Preferences (ranks) in the students’ choices of types of prosocial behaviour (voluntary activity)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.