Abstract
The conception of „nation" as any conception is an instrument. The conception of nation is implicated in the methodology of history. What links exist between this conception and the methodology of history? What are the differences between the conceptions of nation of those historians whose methodologies of history are various? In this article, the methodological positions of five contemporary Lithuanian historians are under analysis. The conceptions of nation of Rimantas Vebra, Egidijus Aleksandravičius, and Antanas Kulakauskas are typologically similar and are described as being in ethnocultural and social criteria. The looks for the methodology of history of these historians mean opposition to attachment great importance of economical factors in the Lithuanian Marxist methodology of history, and to the conception of humanistic history. The critical Marxist, Leonas Mulevičius, describes the conception of nation more according to economical criteria. Vincas Trumpa disposes to the study of consciousness, research of the „life of soul of man" and describes „the nation" according to historical, self-conscious criteria. The methodology of historians of Lithuania not only means changes of a world outlook and ideology, but it also marks off a new phase (and different directions) in the history of science.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.