Abstract
To the Ediotr. —I disagree with the recommendation of Drs DeCherney and Koos 1 to administer 1.5 to 2 g/d of elemental calcium to pregnant women at high risk for developing preeclampsia. The studies included in the meta-analysis on which this recommendation was based were principally studies of healthy nulliparous women. 2 There is no information with respect to the use of calcium supplementation for prevention of preeclampsia in women with multiple pregnancies, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or prior preeclampsia. As described elsewhere, 3 many of the previous studies had serious methodological shortcomings. Moreover, the safety of calcium supplementation cannot be assured in women with hypercalcemia, renal disease, or a history of urolithiasis. The multicenter trial of Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) 3,4 supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute found that calcium did not prevent preeclampsia or
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.