Abstract
The passage discussed in this essay comes from a moment in Mark Haddon’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time when the protagonist-narrator Christopher’s entire worldview is threatened. He has been trying to solve a mystery of who killed the neighbor’s dog, and he has just learned that his father is the killer and that his mother, whom he thought dead (because that’s what his father told him), is living in London with her lover. As Christopher looks at the stars, he explains to the reader why this is a good way to cope with “difficult things” in life. Through a close reading of the passage, I show how Christopher positions rationality in order to discuss disorder and violence, while insulating himself from it. I go on to argue that his use of the whodunit as his genre of choice serves a similar purpose. In both cases, however, the novel shows the limitations of rationality. It may be a helpful coping mechanism, but personal growth requires engaging in the emotional complexity and human messiness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.