Abstract
Acid mine drainage has become a serious environmental concern in South Africa, particularly for the long-term sustainability of the country’s fresh water supply. Such concerns were dramatically highlighted in January 2012 when water in the Boesmanspruit Dam, which supplies the town of Carolina with potable water, underwent rapid deterioration following a large rainstorm event. A sudden drop in pH to 3.7, accompanied by elevated levels of iron, aluminium, manganese and sulphate rendered the water toxic and unsuitable for use. The problem remained unresolved for 7 months, provoking community protests and eventually court action against the Department of Water Affairs. Although evidence pointed to coal mining as the source of contamination, it was unclear how the dam became polluted so rapidly. We investigated the events surrounding the contamination of Carolina’s water supply, in an attempt to identify a possible cause and to assess whether the event has relevance for other dams in the Vaal River system. Chemical analyses of water samples revealed that the pollution originated from the Witrandspruit subcatchment where seepage from coal mines had accumulated in a wetland upstream of the dam. During an unusually heavy downpour, ponds holding polluted run-off from coal handling facilities overtopped and flushed the contents of the wetland into the Boesmanspruit Dam. While a recurrence of the event at Carolina is possible, major dams in the upper Vaal River catchment are unlikely to experience a similar catastrophic event. In the long term, pollution of these dams is likely to proceed gradually, as is currently occurring at the Middelburg and Witbank Dams.
Highlights
IntroductionThe country is the sixth largest coal producer and the fifth largest exporter of coal in the world.[1] Coal plays an integral role in South Africa’s domestic economy, with approximately 93% of the country’s electricity produced by coal-fired stations.[2] Most collieries are concentrated in the Mpumalanga Province, around the towns of Witbank, Middelburg, Ermelo and Secunda
Perhaps the most serious immediate environmental concern is that of acid mine drainage.[3,4,5]
In February and March 2012, water samples were collected from the Boesmanspruit Dam and certain of its tributaries by Dr JP Pretorius, which were analysed by Regen Waters Laboratory, Witbank
Summary
The country is the sixth largest coal producer and the fifth largest exporter of coal in the world.[1] Coal plays an integral role in South Africa’s domestic economy, with approximately 93% of the country’s electricity produced by coal-fired stations.[2] Most collieries are concentrated in the Mpumalanga Province, around the towns of Witbank, Middelburg, Ermelo and Secunda. Coal production and use results in a number of serious environmental impacts. South Africa’s CO2 emissions from fuel combustion were around 340 Mt in 2006, making it the 15th largest emitter of CO2 globally.[2] Eskom’s coal-fired power stations and Sasol’s commercial coal synfuel plants account for the majority of this emission. Perhaps the most serious immediate environmental concern is that of acid mine drainage.[3,4,5]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
