Abstract

Migrant men and women still differ extensively in their integration chances within receiving societies. Research suggests that next to educational discrepancies and traditional gender roles, migrant men benefit particularly from their contact to natives who facilitate the access to other relevant resources such as employment. However, we know actually very little about how recent migrant men and women build their social networks within receiving societies, how their networks differ, and why they potentially differ. In this paper I therefore study Turkish migrants in Germany within their first years after migration and the extent to which Turkish men and women differ in their likelihood to have contact to natives. Theoretically, I explore three main determinants for potential gender differences: Family influence, opportunity structure, and personal preferences. I thereby make use of the two-wave data from the “Social Cultural Integration Processes” Project (SCIP) which studies migrants within their first 3 years after migration. I find that after 3 years after migration Turkish women are not only more likely to report to have no contact to natives than Turkish men; Even if they do have contact, this contact occurs significantly less frequent among Turkish women than among Turkish men. Results suggest that Turkish women, who migrated for family reasons are exposed to the influence of the family in the receiving country, which is often found to govern social behavior. Also, compared to Turkish men, Turkish women are less likely to be employed which limits their opportunity to meet natives. Gendered preferences for contact to natives, however, do not explain why Turkish women have less contact to natives than Turkish men.

Highlights

  • Migrant men and women still differ extensively in their integration chances within receiving societies, with regards to labor market integration (Khoudja and Fleischmann, 2015; Ala-Mantila and Fleischmann, 2018)

  • Gender differences can be found among those, who report to have at least some contact to natives: Almost 70% of Turkish men report that they spend time with natives on a weekly or daily basis, which is only the case for 44% of Turkish women

  • Despite the valuable research in this area, little is known about gender differences in this regard

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Migrant men and women still differ extensively in their integration chances within receiving societies, with regards to labor market integration (Khoudja and Fleischmann, 2015; Ala-Mantila and Fleischmann, 2018). We know very little about how migrant men and women build their social networks within receiving societies, how their networks differ, and why they potentially differ In this contribution I study gender differences in contact to natives among Turkish migrants, who arrived only recently in Germany. I focus on Kalmijn’s (1998) theoretical distinction of the following three main determinants of contact to natives: Family influence, opportunity structure, and preferences Each of these dimensions are gendered and likely to lead to different outcomes for migrant men and women with regards to contact to natives. Literature suggests that migrant women might have weaker preferences for contact to natives than migrant men: Women generally express stronger preferences than men for close-knit social relations (Moore, 1990), which in the migrant context consist mainly of co-ethnic contacts rather than contacts to natives

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.