Contact Multigraph Routing: Overview and Implementation

Abstract

In Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN), the standard routing algorithm used to navigate time-varying networks has been Contact Graph Routing (CGR). In CGR, a globally distributed list of contacts, periods during which two DTN nodes may communicate, is used to construct a contact graph, in which contacts are vertices. A version of Dijkstra's algorithm can then be used to find paths through this model of the time-varying network. However, since contact graphs may be large compared to the network, potentially growing with the square of the number of network nodes and linearly with the time interval represented, the resulting algorithm does not scale well with the size of the network or time. Any improvement to the routing algorithm will bring significant returns to scale. In a previous paper, we briefly introduced an alternative to the contact graph model for routing. This alternative model is based on a multigraph (a graph in which there may be multiple edges between a pair of vertices) where vertices represent network nodes instead of contacts. A version of Dijkstra's algorithm in these multigraph models reduces the time needed to perform the same routing computations done in the existing CGR algorithm. Moreover, a modified version of Yen's algorithm for multigraphs is included. Our variation of CGR, which we call Contact Multi-graph Routing (CMR), provides an in-line replacement for the previously used pathfinding algorithms. This paper describes an implementation created based on the CMR approach, and experimental comparisons to traditional CGR are given. In addition, we explore some additional modifications to the routing pipeline traditionally assumed in CGR. These modifications range from the theoretical to the practical in terms of size and scope. We step forward our understanding of sheaf-theoretic networking and describe how to model the routing pipeline using sheaves. We detail some enhanced route selection criteria that addresses some of the added complexity of DTN-based systems. We also include a future works section on future improvements and implementations that would be of service to the broader DTN community.