Abstract
The role of language contact in linguistic change seems to have caused considerable perplexity and bewilderment in the historical linguistics and sociolinguistics literature in the last decades. Proponents of the contact-leads-to-simplification view very often point out that the simplest languages in the world are obviously pidgins and thus creoles, and that these languages are equally obviously the result of language contact. Language contact, then, can fairly obviously be associated with both simplification and complexification. Contact-induced simplification in non-creole varieties of Arabic generally has been a more controversial topic. There is, then, evidence, that the two different types of language contact have indeed given rise to two different kinds of outcome in Arabic in terms of complexification and simplification. Keywords: Arabic; complexification; language contact; simplification
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
