Abstract

Modulations of blood glucose concentration (BGC) in the normal range are known to facilitate performance in memory and other cognitive tasks but few studies have investigated the effects of BGC variations on complex sensorimotor task so far. The present study aimed to examine glucose effects with the Eriksen flanker task. This task was chosen because it can dissociate between the effects of BGC on sensorimotor processing and cognitive control by assessing congruency effects. In two linked double-blind placebo-controlled experiments BGC was elevated within the normal BGC range (4–7 mmol/l) by approx. 1.5 mmol/l with glucose drinks and compared to a placebo drink condition while a flanker task with either strong or weak stimulus-response (SR) mapping was performed. Modulation of the performance in the flanker task by glucose was linked to the strength of the SR mapping but not congruency effects. Under weak SR mapping, reaction times (RTs) were slowed in the glucose condition compared to placebo while error rates remained unchanged, whereas cognitive control was not affected by glucose. When SR mapping was strong, no differences were found between glucose and placebo. Enhanced glucose levels differentially affect behavior. Whereas the literature mainly reports facilitating characteristics of enhanced glucose levels in the normal range, the present study shows that higher glucose levels can slow RTs. This suggests that glucose does not have a uniform effect on cognition and that it might be differential depending on the cognitive domain.

Highlights

  • Teachers and parents frequently report that the consumption of glucose-rich foods is detrimental to children’s classroom behavior and their learning

  • The only differences were that (1) only behavioral responses were recorded in experiment 2, (2) the flanker task started at 10.00 am, (3) the design of the flanker task changed, and (4) the blood glucose concentration (BGC) measurements were taken with a Hemocue 201+ blood glucose meter (Hemocue Ltd.)

  • Our findings suggest that glucose alters the performance in the flanker task but does so only if SR mapping is weak

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Teachers and parents frequently report that the consumption of glucose-rich foods is detrimental to children’s classroom behavior and their learning. Reviews suggest that experimental elevation of blood glucose concentration (BGC) levels in the euglycemic range (4–7 mmol/l) typically facilitates performance in cognitive tasks (Riby, 2004; Feldman and Barshi, 2007). Only four studies investigated glucose drink effects using the Stroop task (Benton et al, 1994; Craft et al, 1994; Gailliot et al, 2007; Brown and Riby, 2013), and these did not show a coherent picture: Craft et al (1994) and Benton et al (1994) found a glucose facilitation effect for reaction times (RTs), Brown and Riby (2013) reported a borderline significant glucose facilitation effect on RTs, and Gailliot et al (2007) found no glucose effects These discrepant findings might be explained by methodological differences between the studies, such as fasting instructions or the control of BGC prior to and/or throughout the experiment. It might be the case that conflict tasks are less susceptible to glucose effects

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.