Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the intake and ingestive behavior of sheep and goats fed with cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica Mill) and prickly pear (Opuntia sp.). Twenty crossbred animals – 10 sheep and 10 goats – were used. They were lodged in a collective shed, contained individually with ropes, distributed using a completely randomized design, and treated with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement (2 animal species and 2 varieties of cactus). Behavioral observations were made at five-minute intervals during a 24-hour period. Dry matter, ether extract, acid detergent fiber, total carbohydrate and non-fibrous carbohydrate intake were reduced (p < 0.05) by prickly pear. There was no effect from cactus variety, animal species or animal species x cactus variety interaction (p > 0.05) on feeding time and feeding efficiency. The time spent with rumination was greater for the diet with prickly pear, and the animals on the prickly pear diet remained more time idle. Comparing goats and sheep species, it was verified that the rumination efficiency, for both DM and NDF, was greater for sheep species. The animals spent more time ruminating lying than standing, but no difference was verified between the sides on which the animals chose to lie down.

Highlights

  • Nos últimos anos, tem crescido o desenvolvimento de tecnologias de produção de espécies forrageiras adaptadas a estresse hídrico, com destaque para a palma forrageira

  • A composição química dos ingredientes é apresentada na Tabela 1 e a das dietas na Tabela 2

  • 23,93a 12,62b 18,77a 17,78a 28,68 a, b Médias na linha seguidas de letras distintas diferem entre si estatisticamente pelo teste F (p < 0,05). a, b Means, within a row, followed by different letters are different by the F-test (p < 0,05)

Read more

Summary

Material e métodos

O experimento foi realizado na Estação Experimental de Sertânia, pertencente à Empresa Pernambucana de Pesquisa Agropecuária – IPA, no período de março a abril de 2006. A precipitação pluviométrica anual é de 635 mm e os meses mais chuvosos são março e abril. Foram utilizados 20 animais, sendo dez caprinos e dez ovinos, mestiços, machos e inteiros. Inicialmente, os animais foram pesados e alojados em galpão coletivo, sendo contidos individualmente por meio de cordas. Os animais dispunham de cocho de madeira e balde de plástico adaptado para bebedouro, para que se pudesse avaliar individualmente o consumo de alimentos. Buffel (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), Farelo de Soja e Sal Mineral (Tabela 2). A composição química dos ingredientes é apresentada na Tabela 1 e a das dietas na Tabela 2. MS (%) DM (%) PB (%MS) CP (%DM) EE (%MS) EE (% DM) FDN (%MS) NDF (%DM) FDNcp (%MS) NDFcp (%DM) FDA (%MS) ADF (%DM) MO (%MS) OM (%DM)

Chemical composition of experimental diet
Resultados e discussão
Variável Variable
Ovino Caprino
Chemical composition
Prickly pear
DRD LRR

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.