Abstract

What separates spoken word as an art form from the interminable spectacle of hearing a poet read a poem (be she amateur or professional) is the extent to which the artist brings a sense of performance to the event — by which I mean not only the theatrical presentation of the poem but also the manner in which the “eventness” of the poem is taken into account in the moment of its production. A public reading of a poem is often offered as a presentation of a finished work, to be appreciated by an audience, much like a painting on a wall. Spoken-word practice, in contrast, is informed by the much longer tradition of oral poetry (which I would like to call “performance poetry”), in which the audience is implicated in the social construction of meaning: rather than gazing at the painting, we are witnesses to and conspirators in its creation. While it is beyond the scope of this paper to even casually sketch out a history of what I call “performance poetry,” I believe that the example set by bpNichol and Steve McCaffery in 1982, with their performance piece The Language of Performance of Language is a touchstone, not only for avant-garde practice, but also for the more mainstream work being carried out by today’s performance poets, and deserves consideration as such.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call