Abstract

This study was conducted at two different restaurants of Raymond Mhlaba Municipality (Alice), Eastern Cape, South Africa, to determine consumers’ social representations of meat safety. A total number of 251 people were interviewed in focus group discussions, each comprising 4–6 interviewees were conducted. Each focus group consisted of university students and staff, and members of rural communities surrounding the town of Alice. A semi-structured questionnaire comprising both closed-ended and open-ended questions was used to collect data. Consumers were concerned about the hygiene at the place of purchase and the freshness of meat. Moreover, they revealed that they were always worried about the risk of food-borne diseases. Although food-borne diseases were not cited as a significant problem, related ideas such as “washing of hands before preparation of food to minimize food-borne diseases” were important to consumers. Consumers indicated that meat safety at the abattoirs should be thoroughly managed given that “hygiene during meat processing is important to prevent the occurrence of food-borne diseases”. Consumers in both retail outlets have shown to have a limited understanding of meat safety. Thus, consumers’ social representations, perceptions, and knowledge are complex and dynamic with respect to meat safety.

Highlights

  • Social representations (SRs) refer to information arranged in a systematic way with different consumer attitudes, opinions, and beliefs about a given product [1]

  • Consumers face challenges with respect to how to judge risks regarding meat safety. Their insights on meat safety are based on the trust placed in the meat supply chain, which does not persist over time [3]

  • The study was conducted at the University of Fort Hare Staff Centre and Champs restaurant in Alice of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social representations (SRs) refer to information arranged in a systematic way with different consumer attitudes, opinions, and beliefs about a given product [1]. Socio-cultural and integration procedures constitutes SRs. People’s backgrounds and authenticity influence SRs [2]. Social representations can be substituted or integrated into an individual’s behavior, awareness, and social critical thinking. Consumers face challenges with respect to how to judge risks regarding meat safety Their insights on meat safety are based on the trust placed in the meat supply chain, which does not persist over time [3]. All these issues are crucial and must receive attention when formulating regulations and programs concerning meat safety

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.