Abstract

This study examines the process by which consumer dissatisfaction is formed under negative expectancy disconfirmation with respect to consumer attributions and emotions. Although previous studies have demonstrated that negative expectancy disconfirmation can induce dissatisfaction of consumers, few studies have provided specific discussions on the mechanism underlying such dissatisfaction. This study focuses on consumers' cognitive and psychological responses to negative expectancy disconfirmation and examines the process by which consumer dissatisfaction is formed. For this, the study employs consumer attributions and emotional responses as antecedent variables for consumer dissatisfaction. Specifically, the study considers internal and external attributions as consumer attributions and anger and regret as their emotions. It further examines the mechanism underlying consumer dissatisfaction and behavior. The results indicate that under negative expectancy disconfirmation, external attributions were more likely to induce anger than regret, whereas internal attributions were more likely to induce regret than anger. Consumers’ dissatisfaction and behaviors, such as complaining and switching, were more likely to be influenced by anger than by regret.

Highlights

  • Consumers form expectations before buying a product

  • We examined the relationships between consumer attribution, emotional responses, and behavioral responses under negative expectancy disconfirmation after making a purchase

  • Anger was more likely to induce dissatisfaction than regret. This suggests that the extent to which negative emotions influence dissatisfaction under a purchase failure vary according to the type of emotion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Consumers form expectations before buying a product. The situation in which the actual performance of a purchased product fails to meet the expectations is referred to as negative expectancy disconfirmation. Negative expectancy disconfirmation is more likely to induce consumers to make attributions (Folkes, 1984; 1988; Hastie, 1984; Weiner, 2000) than positive expectancy disconfirmation (Gendolla & Koller, 2002) These attributions lead to emotional responses (Gendolla & Koller, 2002; Weiner, 2000). Studies on the relationship between attributions and emotional responses indicated that attributions can arouse emotional responses, suggesting that individuals feel as they think and that a change in thinking causes an emotional change They suggested that one of the most important types of cognition influencing emotions is causal attribution; that is, why a certain event has or has not occurred. It can be said that attributions represent one of the most important cognitive appraisals arousing emotions (Lazarus, 1982; 1984; 1991)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call